<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TrustStix Blog</title>
	<link>http://www.truststix.com/blog</link>
	<description>Patterns, Practices and Results</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yahoo+MSFT - more questions on both sides than answers by hentai lactating fucked</title>
		<link>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/#comment-471</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/#comment-471</guid>
					<description>lactating lesbian hentai &lt;a href=&quot;http://rollyo.com/hentai-lactating&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hentai lactating fucked&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lactating lesbian hentai <a href="http://rollyo.com/hentai-lactating" rel="nofollow">hentai lactating fucked</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yahoo+MSFT - more questions on both sides than answers by collection hentai mayuka</title>
		<link>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/#comment-468</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/#comment-468</guid>
					<description>mayuko mayuka hentai &lt;a href=&quot;http://rollyo.com/hentai-mayuka&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mayuka tsunade hentai&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mayuko mayuka hentai <a href="http://rollyo.com/hentai-mayuka" rel="nofollow">mayuka tsunade hentai</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yahoo+MSFT - more questions on both sides than answers by threesome lesbian les</title>
		<link>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/#comment-451</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/#comment-451</guid>
					<description>lesbian les lesbians &lt;a href=&quot;http://rollyo.com/lesbian-les&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;milfs lesbian les&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lesbian les lesbians <a href="http://rollyo.com/lesbian-les" rel="nofollow">milfs lesbian les</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MSFT+YHOO - Is this a possibility? by Shivaram Mysore</title>
		<link>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/02/msftyhoo-is-this-a-possibility/#comment-5</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/02/msftyhoo-is-this-a-possibility/#comment-5</guid>
					<description>A very nice blog post by NBA Dallas Mavericks Owner - Mark Cuban on why Yahoo should yes to MSFT offer - http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/02/03/why-yahoo-should-say-yes-to-microsoft/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very nice blog post by NBA Dallas Mavericks Owner - Mark Cuban on why Yahoo should yes to MSFT offer - <a href='http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/02/03/why-yahoo-should-say-yes-to-microsoft/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/02/03/why-yahoo-should-say-yes-to-microsoft/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web 2.0 Security by Shivaram Mysore</title>
		<link>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>This white paper is also posted on Help Net Security:  http://www.net-security.org/article.php?id=1108</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This white paper is also posted on Help Net Security:  <a href='http://www.net-security.org/article.php?id=1108' rel='nofollow'>http://www.net-security.org/article.php?id=1108</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web 2.0 Security by Ravi Char</title>
		<link>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/#comment-2</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/#comment-2</guid>
					<description>Shivaram:

Congrats on your blog. 

Web 2.0 is a term often misunderstood and it has multiple interpretations. I commend you for addressing security issue in this area.

Information Security is all about protecting data - Confidentiality-Integrity- Availability. This objective of protecting data does not change with technology used to access the data. The goal is to deploy technology to access the data at the same time preserve the objective of protecting the data. In your Whitepaper you are right on, when you say usage determines the threat scenarios this is where Web 2.0 differs significantly from earlier web - I look forward to read your thoughts on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shivaram:</p>
<p>Congrats on your blog. </p>
<p>Web 2.0 is a term often misunderstood and it has multiple interpretations. I commend you for addressing security issue in this area.</p>
<p>Information Security is all about protecting data - Confidentiality-Integrity- Availability. This objective of protecting data does not change with technology used to access the data. The goal is to deploy technology to access the data at the same time preserve the objective of protecting the data. In your Whitepaper you are right on, when you say usage determines the threat scenarios this is where Web 2.0 differs significantly from earlier web - I look forward to read your thoughts on this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.061 seconds -->
