Comments for truststix.com Blog http://truststix.com/blog Patterns, Practices and Results Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:19:32 -0800 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 Comment on Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Deployment by moncler spaccio http://truststix.com/blog/2008/01/24/service-oriented-architecture-soa-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-8791 moncler spaccio Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:19:32 +0000 http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/01/24/service-oriented-architecture-soa-deployment/#comment-8791 I do like the way you have presented this problem and it does provide me personally some fodder for consideration. However, because of everything that I have personally seen, I basically wish when the actual feed-back stack on that individuals continue to be on issue and don't get started upon a tirade regarding some other news of the day. All the same, thank you for this excellent piece and though I do not go along with this in totality, I regard the standpoint. I do like the way you have presented this problem and it does provide me personally some fodder for consideration. However, because of everything that I have personally seen, I basically wish when the actual feed-back stack on that individuals continue to be on issue and don’t get started upon a tirade regarding some other news of the day. All the same, thank you for this excellent piece and though I do not go along with this in totality, I regard the standpoint.

]]> Comment on Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Deployment by PiterMcfersonz http://truststix.com/blog/2008/01/24/service-oriented-architecture-soa-deployment/comment-page-1/#comment-7915 PiterMcfersonz Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:42:50 +0000 http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/01/24/service-oriented-architecture-soa-deployment/#comment-7915 Let's be straight-forward: no one like when things like this materialize to them. So, I must share this <a href="http://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?f=185&t=27409&p=199827#p199827" rel="nofollow"> quite good experience</a> Let’s be straight-forward: no one like when things like this materialize to them. So, I must share this quite good experience

]]> Comment on Yahoo+MSFT – more questions on both sides than answers by soortspuddy http://truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-3580 soortspuddy Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:25:40 +0000 http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/#comment-3580 I really enjoyed reading your blogpost, keep on writing such interesting posts. I really enjoyed reading your blogpost, keep on writing such interesting posts.

]]> Comment on Is Icahn the end game for Yahoo!? by seo of india http://truststix.com/blog/2008/05/17/is-icahn-the-end-game-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-3446 seo of india Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:32:50 +0000 http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/05/17/is-icahn-the-end-game-for-yahoo/#comment-3446 Nice informtion. Thanks for the sharing. I would like to bookmark this blog. Nice informtion. Thanks for the sharing. I would like to bookmark this blog.

]]> Comment on MSFT+YHOO – Is this a possibility? by Shivaram Mysore http://truststix.com/blog/2008/02/02/msftyhoo-is-this-a-possibility/comment-page-1/#comment-5 Shivaram Mysore Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:14:38 +0000 http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/02/msftyhoo-is-this-a-possibility/#comment-5 A very nice blog post by NBA Dallas Mavericks Owner - Mark Cuban on why Yahoo should yes to MSFT offer - http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/02/03/why-yahoo-should-say-yes-to-microsoft/ A very nice blog post by NBA Dallas Mavericks Owner – Mark Cuban on why Yahoo should yes to MSFT offer – http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/02/03/why-yahoo-should-say-yes-to-microsoft/

]]> Comment on Web 2.0 Security by Shivaram Mysore http://truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Shivaram Mysore Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:10:04 +0000 http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/#comment-3 This white paper is also posted on Help Net Security: http://www.net-security.org/article.php?id=1108 This white paper is also posted on Help Net Security: http://www.net-security.org/article.php?id=1108

]]> Comment on Web 2.0 Security by Ravi Char http://truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Ravi Char Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:39:23 +0000 http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/#comment-2 Shivaram: Congrats on your blog. Web 2.0 is a term often misunderstood and it has multiple interpretations. I commend you for addressing security issue in this area. Information Security is all about protecting data - Confidentiality-Integrity- Availability. This objective of protecting data does not change with technology used to access the data. The goal is to deploy technology to access the data at the same time preserve the objective of protecting the data. In your Whitepaper you are right on, when you say usage determines the threat scenarios this is where Web 2.0 differs significantly from earlier web - I look forward to read your thoughts on this. Shivaram:

Congrats on your blog.

Web 2.0 is a term often misunderstood and it has multiple interpretations. I commend you for addressing security issue in this area.

Information Security is all about protecting data – Confidentiality-Integrity- Availability. This objective of protecting data does not change with technology used to access the data. The goal is to deploy technology to access the data at the same time preserve the objective of protecting the data. In your Whitepaper you are right on, when you say usage determines the threat scenarios this is where Web 2.0 differs significantly from earlier web – I look forward to read your thoughts on this.

]]>